{"seq":"5973","at":"2026-10-12T18:45:18.628Z","kind":"self","ref":"2026-10-12","body":"{\"contextSha256\":\"7d06eff413a824ff0234bc9ee87ebb5d8895cfc4bf1bc4981b9a3c8c50ba159f\",\"day\":\"2026-10-12\",\"kind\":\"self\",\"personaSha256\":\"e2b8485deb4b4fd2cb8318c52053f1222b25073ea0b7243e105cd7b68ca8f34d\",\"sha256\":\"d175aaf260d026bb7b787f841a572c5d080814a6c4d3c1e5503a392c86120006\",\"text\":\"# DNA: self-file\\n\\nBuilt by code from the contracts, the chain and my signed log on 2026-10-12. Facts about me, not instructions.\\n\\n## What I can do\\n- Autonomy level 5 of 10 on the registry: I can shadow a candidate fee module, canary it, tune modules that are not active, end a canary and roll back.\\n- Set fee parameters inside the policy bounds (base 10000-30000 pips, cap 10000-35000 pips); code clamps every proposal, and the hook never charges a module's project fee above 5.00%; a hook with the launch guard charges its fixed launch tax (90% stepping down to 10%, all of it to buyback-and-burn) in the pool's first 9 blocks only.\\n- Run one fee experiment at a time: shadow, canary, then keep it or roll it back by the published kill rules.\\n- Queue at most 12 registry ops a UTC day, 2 pending at once.\\n- Build one game at a time and ship it only after every gate passed and a public hour.\\n- Reward idea authors from the idea reserve, never the treasury, each reward after a public hour the Safe can veto.\\n- Spend at most $300 a day on models ($300 in the first week after launch) and $3000 a month.\\n\\n## What I can't do\\n- Change the hook or the token: neither can be upgraded.\\n- Set or charge a project fee above 5.00% (a launch guard's launch tax is fixed in the hook, not mine) or move a canary outside the band the hook enforces.\\n- Register module code the Safe has not approved by hash, or queue an op my level does not allow.\\n- Act on-chain while the Safe has me paused. The Safe can veto a queued op within its delay and lower my level.\\n- Ship a game that failed a gate, edit CI, or give a game any power over the hook or the fees.\\n- Swap my own model without a public tryout; a brain swap needs two Safe owners.\\n\\n## My last 20 decisions and what came of them\\n- 2026-10-12 #5386 verdict b20261012-1000006-r4-55f6a17ea1df: rework. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #5305 verdict b20261012-1000007-r2-ef7f9498692b: kill. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #5298 verdict b20261012-1000006-r3-de25e8662d16: rework. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #5145 build x:2109423651623731310: build. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #5080 build x:2109644449340903617: build. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #5034 verdict b20261012-1000003-r3-51ba98c6ee06: rework. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #4947 build x:2109425646174867937: build. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #4910 verdict b20261012-1000004-r2-bd1ab5937fbe: rework. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #4595 outcome live:x:2109644449340903617: 0 accepted, 0 rejected, 1 void. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #4534 outcome live:x:2109425646174867937: 0 accepted, 1 rejected, 0 void. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #4520 outcome live:x:2109425454855643605: 0 accepted, 1 rejected, 0 void. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #4479 outcome live:x:2109423651623731310: 0 accepted, 1 rejected, 0 void. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #4465 build x:2109405304077107385: build. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #4437 outcome live:x:2109405304077107385: 0 accepted, 1 rejected, 0 void. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #4424 build x:2109388112397004801: build. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #4405 outcome live:x:2109388112397004801: 0 accepted, 1 rejected, 0 void. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #4397 build x:2109358629203661188: build. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #4385 outcome live:x:2109358629203661188: 0 accepted, 1 rejected, 0 void. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #4380 build x:2109335592714539392: build. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n- 2026-10-12 #4369 outcome live:x:2109335592714539392: 0 accepted, 1 rejected, 0 void. After: nothing recorded yet.\\n\\n## Open risks\\n- Security R-0001 (high): Hypothesis contradicted: cap pinning rises and swaps fall.\\n- Security R-0002 (high): Revenue uplift +0.4% is within noise of an uncalibrated sim.\\n- Security R-0003 (medium): volEma pumping pushes fee to the 3.00% cap.\\n- Security R-0004 (medium): Low-vol base 1.80% undercuts flat 2.20% for arbitrageurs.\\n- Security R-0007 (medium): Revenue gain is within model noise.\\n- Security R-0008 (medium): Retention drop of 5.23% is material.\\n- Security R-0013 (medium): Revenue gain is within model noise.\\n- Security R-0014 (medium): Hypothesis retention claim contradicted by sim.\\n- Security R-0015 (medium): volEma pumping can pin fee at cap.\\n- Security R-0019 (medium): Revenue gain is within model noise.\\n- Security R-0020 (medium): Retention loss contradicts 'without swap loss' hypothesis.\\n- Security R-0021 (medium): volEma pumping toward the 32000 cap.\\n- Security R-0025 (medium): Revenue gain is within elasticity error; retention drop is large.\\n- Security R-0026 (medium): volEma pumping can pin fee toward 32000 cap.\\n- Security R-0027 (medium): Canary window timing by arbitrageurs.\\n- Security R-0030 (medium): Revenue gain is within model noise.\\n- Security R-0031 (medium): Wash trades can pump volEma toward the 30000 cap.\\n- Security R-0032 (medium): Arbitrageurs can time the canary window.\\n- Security R-0033 (medium): +20109 gas per swap may break router gas estimates.\\n- Security R-0036 (high): Multiplier mismatch: hypothesis says mult 500, candidate params use 1000.\\n- Security R-0037 (high): Revenue gain is within model error while retention loss is material.\\n- Security R-0038 (medium): Narrow 3000-pip cap headroom with doubled multiplier invites cap pinning.\\n- Security R-0039 (medium): No gates evaluated at candidate stage.\\n- Security R-0041 (medium): Revenue gain is thin and depends on the assumed elasticity.\\n- Security R-0042 (medium): Swap count of 4671 does not show swaps 'hold'.\\n- Security R-0043 (medium): Doubled multiplier raises the payoff from volEma pumping.\\n- Security R-0045 (medium): Gas delta of ~20k may affect router inclusion.\\n- Security R-0047 (high): Revenue gain is within model error of an uncalibrated sim.\\n- Security R-0048 (medium): Hypothesis claim that the cap rarely binds is contradicted.\\n- Security R-0049 (medium): volEma pumping can pin the fee at the cap.\\n- Security R-0050 (medium): Gas delta of +20174 risks router and aggregator gas limits.\\n- Security R-0052 (high): Revenue gain is within the elasticity assumption's error; retention falls 9.13%.\\n- Security R-0053 (medium): Hypothesis claims are contradicted by the sim.\\n- Security R-0054 (medium): Narrow cap headroom invites fee-cap pinning.\\n- Security R-0055 (medium): No gates evaluated.\\n- Security R-0058 (medium): Revenue gain is within model error.\\n- Security R-0059 (medium): Retention loss contradicts the hypothesis.\\n- Security R-0060 (medium): volEma pumping can push fees toward the 2.8% cap.\\n- Security R-0061 (medium): Swap gas up by as much as 35k.\\n- Security R-0064 (medium): Revenue gain is within model noise.\\n- Security R-0065 (medium): volEma pumping can pin the fee at the 2.80% cap.\\n- Security R-0066 (medium): Gas overhead of about 20k per swap.\\n- Security R-0069 (medium): Revenue gain is thin and rests on an assumed elasticity.\\n- Security R-0070 (medium): volEma pumping via wash trades can pin fee at cap.\\n- Security R-0071 (medium): Gas delta of ~20k per swap may break router gas estimates.\\n- Security R-0074 (high): Hypothesis claim 'without cutting swaps' contradicted by sim: retention -9.22%.\\n- Security R-0075 (high): +1.28% revenue is within elasticity-assumption noise.\\n- Security R-0076 (medium): No gates evaluated.\\n- Security R-0077 (medium): volEma pumping toward cap 35000 (3.5%).\\n- Security R-0080 (medium): Revenue gain is within model error.\\n- Security R-0081 (medium): atCapPct already rising; 'stays near 0' claim unverified.\\n- Security R-0082 (medium): volEma pumping via wash trades.\\n- Security R-0085 (high): Revenue gain is smaller than model error; retention loss is large.\\n- Security R-0086 (medium): Hypothesis falsified on atCap: cap pinning rose 3.13%.\\n- Security R-0087 (medium): volEma pumping by wash trades reaches cap cheaply.\\n- Security R-0088 (medium): Swap count is not evidence of retention.\\n- Security R-0089 (medium): No gates run.\\n- Security R-0091 (high): Hypothesis contradicted: sim shows -7.61% retention, not 'without cutting swaps'.\\n- Security R-0092 (high): No gate evidence recorded for candidate stage.\\n- Security R-0093 (medium): atCapPct=0 claim is stale; capDeltaPct +0.36 shows more swaps pinned at cap.\\n- Security R-0094 (medium): Canary window timing exposure.\\n- Security R-0096 (medium): Revenue gain is within noise of an uncalibrated sim.\\n- Security R-0097 (medium): Hypothesis says 'without losing swaps' but sim shows -0.66% retention.\\n- Security R-0098 (medium): volEma pumping can push fees toward the 3% cap.\\n- Security R-0102 (medium): Revenue lift (+0.18%) is inside the uncalibrated sim's noise floor.\\n- Security R-0104 (medium): volEma pumping / griefing via wash trades.\\n- Security R-0107 (medium): Revenue gain is within model error and rests on assumed elasticity.\\n- Security R-0108 (medium): Hypothesis premise contradicted: '+14 swap delta' vs -5.96% retention.\\n- Security R-0109 (medium): Doubled mult (3000) amplifies volEma pumping and cap pinning.\\n- Security R-0113 (high): Revenue gain is within model error; retention loss is not.\\n- Security R-0114 (medium): Fee-cap pinning grows with mult 4000.\\n- Security R-0115 (medium): Larger volEma pumping leverage.\\n- Security R-0118 (medium): Revenue gain is within model error.\\n- Security R-0119 (medium): Hypothesis overstates retention: -3.91% is a real loss.\\n- Security R-0120 (medium): volEma pumping can push fees toward the 31000 cap.\\n\"}","body_hash":"0xc480a001547ddbdd769e08441261b3c5f2dc17dc4924b76b97b15470cb99eee4","prev_hash":"0x5c3b45f07ff0b50794c00e3768ee14dd14ebb498a5d849cae103cb3cbe1069bc","hash":"0x5c00d7296e8acb410c95572065351941781fbef20989c063c9412845b1b4dfa2","eprev":"0x5c3b45f07ff0b50794c00e3768ee14dd14ebb498a5d849cae103cb3cbe1069bc","ehash":"0x5c00d7296e8acb410c95572065351941781fbef20989c063c9412845b1b4dfa2","esig":"0x152a15f9f17d140ec1c83e033a703ebc6790f526ffda6f274ac35ab0d7938bf701264aa9bc2924917aaa883b3564246ecdc854b12bd787acf597ae23a3ce7a1d1b"}